The US has been particularly persistent in scrutinising Kaspersky, across several administrations, but it arguably all came to a head in 2017. Get a better understanding of emerging zero trust solutions Introducing the zero trust edge model for security and network services A similar law exists in China and has largely underpinned the West’s discomfort around companies like Huawei (opens in new tab). The perceived heightened risk of Kaspersky, now war has broken out, essentially stems from the legal obligation for Russian-based businesses to comply with requests from the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB). Since the invasion, Germany, the US, and the UK have all released separate advisories warning businesses of the alleged risks of using Kaspersky’s products (opens in new tab). Serious allegations, severe real-world consequences Arriving at a definitive answer, though, is far from straightforward. This may prompt many organisations into asking whether Kaspersky’s products are, ultimately, safe to use.

While these concerns have rumbled for some time, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has thrown them into the spotlight.Ĭyber security (opens in new tab) authorities from countries including the UK and the US have lined up in recent days to dissuade businesses from using Kaspersky’s products. Questions around Kaspersky have been raised over the last few years, including whether the firm has ties to the Russian government in any capacity, and whether the products are vulnerable.

Kaspersky ties to russian government